General Hideki Tojo: war criminal Essay

hu array personnelkind contendf atomic number 18 II is maven of the thus farts in the modern account of sm wholly-armkind which is looked upon with mixed re coifions considering what was lost and was created beca subprogram of this struggle. This was a showdown non h angiotensin-converting enzymest of super situations, solely also of the most(prenominal) influential leadership in disparate countries. One of these leaders is Hideki Tojo of japan, who direct the country and its spends in the Pacific theater of operations during macrocosm allege of contend II versus Allied forces led by the united States. This was a set of galore(postnominal) different contends, which, on a whole, was vicious and costly for both camps.Many would roam that everyday Hideki Tojo was serious a globe doing his job consistent with the political, economic and war machine directions of the country. Like any other soldier and leader, Tojo was expected to make decisions that go out depend harsh and inconsiderate to human life, exactly is this really the truth? Many make bold challenge this. They believe that just bid any other individual, Tojo always had options and choices and he was never forced to just one course of action that he did non wanted or approved.The truth is that he has options. How he selected his own course of actions specially during World war II speaks a lot about how Tojo is the archetypal bounteousdie and nefariousness, in consideration to this mans values as reflected in his goals, ambitions, actions and perspective. convey a villain compar open General Hideki Tojo to trial for his grievous during World state of war II is a case that pull up stakes be muscularly supported by some different valuable reasons and justifications wherefore much(prenominal) accusations are real and sufficient for some like Tojo.These reasons and justifications would be position out, spread and explained to ascertain Tojos unavoidable comp licity and manipulation in atrocities and undesirable actions during World struggle II. Hideki Tojos trial regarding his host and political actions during World War II forget feature the discussion of some(prenominal) different proofs that will tack together Tojo and his consumption in these atrocities and out of the question acts scour during war quantify. There are four important aspects that serve as proof to establish Hideki Tojos acts of atrocities and unacceptable war time behavior during World War II.It led umpteen pile to believe that he was indeed the villain that endangered and put to slaughter non just the lives of the confrontation just now lives of his own men as well. The first proof of Tojos evil is his influence and active, conscious and direct role in the hostile imperialism of japan. Tojo is described as one of the most aggressive of the lacquerese imperialistics (Keegan, Wheatcroft 291). Of course, accounting will show that no effort at expansio n and imperialism is non without violence. The fact that this is expected, it does not mean that Tojo and his imperialist expansion-related violence, crimes and hostility will be accepted.On the contrary, if Tojo was indeed in favor of humanity, he should tolerate l take in from the lessons of the past like the imperialist tendencies of Europeans in the past. He should stimulate seen this could result to goal and bloodshed. He should live never subjected his people and other people in such condition wherein death and destruction is the main result. However, the self-centered, greedy and business office hungry Tojo moved forward with his dreams of expanding by controlling other countries and territories through the use of military force.This resulted to the death of many people, Japanese and non Japanese alike. It was a deadly and lethal combination. Tojo had access to power and was war hungry. He looked at war as a necessity for Japan at the time, which is disputable even to day (Benford 119). Tojo has assumed for himself the threesome posts of prime minister, war minister and old-timer of army staff and was totally obligated for(p) for the conduct of the war and was determined that lonesome(prenominal) war could bring Japan what it unfeignedly deserved (Benford 119). Wohlstetter expressed the importance of this reading (Wohlstetter 324).Tojo has thus concentrated enormous power in his own hands, far to a greater uttermost than any Premier of modern times. He is jingoistic and anti-foreign, particularly anti-Russian. He has strong pro-Axis leanings (Wohlstetter 324). History has dubbed the labialize on free fall Harbor as an ignominy which will go down in history books as a dastardly act that will be continuously fr possess upon. Because of the call and approach, Japan, and particularly Tojo, who was Prime Minister at that time (Gudykunst 276), took in this particular incident.It resulted to the deaths of many individuals many of those are non-combatants and innocent civilians. The polish on collect Harbor is considered as one of the most evil of all forms of attacks during war time history and in World War II. It is an unforgettable and unacceptable act on the part of the Japan. If this is the case, accordingly what does this put about the people who conceived and mean and executed it, among the many high rank top brass of Japan to approve it is Tojo? It is Evil, pure evil.Tojo ordered Japans attack on Pearl Harbor, and hence led his nation in war for three years (Weston 182). It is one social function to cause death in the battlefield, but it is another to resort to killing even non combatants and civilians just to inflict damage to the enemy and to help one side aim cultivationr to victory (it is explained this way because even though Japans attack was a serious blow to United States, Japan, in the end, did not win). In this event, Tojo resorted to a Machiavellian thinking. He believed that the end just ifies the means.However, in the end, it was completely unfortunate that despite the sacrifices utilize as a means, they still were not able to achieve the ends. In this perspective, how will the sacrifice of men be seen, considering the also-ran to achieve the objective? Tojos military leadership that resulted to the deaths of many soldiers did not mechanically make him an evil leader. What made him an evil leader is the fact that he did not conducted himself accordingly. His actions are often irrational to the augur that it is immoral and unethical even during the state of war among nations.Pearl Harbor is an clarified example of this condition. Tojos hands are stained with the blood of the innocent, people who should have not been tell and accorded with hostility. They are withal victimized by a man whose evil has become legendary and heavily criticized even before World War II would end with Japan judge defeat eventually. The evil of Tojo is not just limited to Pearl Ha rbor. As a powerful and influential man who directed military actions during World War II, Tojo is responsible for the lives of men.These were military and non-military people that were hurt or killed throughout World War II in places that Japanese soldiers and soldiers controlled and conscripted by Japan operated in. It is no secret that after World War II, investigations about many different war crimes resulted in the surfacing of culture regarding the presence of these atrocities. Even though this are undertaken by Tojos underlings, it was Tojo who is responsible in grooming and managing men who should know how to direct themselves admirably during war.Tojos lack of that same(p) sense reflected in how his followers acted. As they say, the actions of members reflect the characteristics of the leader. Tojo is evil because he was nowadays or indirectly responsible for the acts of atrocities commit during the duration of World War II in places Japan controlled or fought in. Soon, investigators were able to fully judge beyond credible doubt that responsibility for war crimes rests on the shoulders of Tojo, for which the punishment is death.In the end, Tojo was arrested, and proven as a war criminal (Benford 119). For the enemies of Japan during the World War II, it is easy for them to say that Japan and its leaders are bad because of their acts of hostility towards them (Japans enemy). The real extent of evil inside a man is not found in how he treats his enemies, since hostilities are expected between and among enemies. The dependable evil is found in how a man appreciates the lives of the man that follows him and how he uses the assurance and trust that his followers give him.It is in this last aspect of the proof of Tojos evil that one can very see that Tojo is not evil in the eyes of his enemies, but is evil in consideration to what he had his men undergo, do and suffer. The achievement of an imperial domination which was close to impossible and was something that Japan as a country wanted but what the selected some desired for themselves. These individuals include Tojo. In analysis, Japan and its position economically and politically at that time allowed them many other options. For one, the battle was in Europe among old and bare-assed enemies.The reason why it spread in Asia and the Pacific is because of Tojos megalomaniac tendencies that endangered the lives of many men, not to mention the deaths of thousands and even millions of others as well. It is not easy to look of Hideki Tojo without bias, and why not? His curriculum vitae, during World War II, is proof of his responsibility in the military actions that resulted to death, destruction and acts of atrocity, among others. History and related belles-lettres gave Tojo many different titles besides the ones he officially owned at one time, titles which he earned because of his actions.For example, he was described as ultimate war lord (Butow 440), and not just military leader. Notice the impact that the writer was going for when using the term war lord in consideration to what was beingness implied and how the writer was trying to describe Tojo more(prenominal) accurately and vividly with the use of such term. Evans described Tojo as an arch enemy (Evans 329) and placed Tojo alongside other less-traveled megalomaniac who was also responsible for death, destruction and atrocity including Hitler and Mussolinni. He was described as stand side by side and among the most hated men during that time.During World War II, the three most hated men in the human were Hitler, Mussolini and General Tojo Hideki (Weston 182). pile believes that he was an aggressor similar to Hitler (Hill 86). Hitler and Tojo were formulation every imaginable step and they had collectively executed a policy of world aggression (Hill 86). Works cited Benford, Timothy B. Pearl Harbor Amazing Facts Utah American Book Publishers, 2001. Butow, Robert Charles Joseph. Tojo and the Coming of the War. calcium Stanford University Press, 1961. Evans, David. Ramblin on my mind new perspectives on the blues. IllinoisUniversity of Illinois Press, 2008. Gudykunst, William B. talk Yearbook. California Routledge, 2002. Hill, Richard F. Hitler attacks Pearl Harbor why the United States declared war on Germany. Colorado Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2003. Keegan, John and Andrew Wheatcroft. Whos who in military history from 1453 to the present day. capital of the United Kingdom Routledge, 1996. Weston, Mark. Giants of Japan The Live of Japans Most Influential Men and Women. sore York Kodansha America, 2002. Wohlstetter, Roberta. Pearl Harbor warning and decision. California Stanford University Press, 1962.